Ventura County, California:
Domestic violence victim Claudia Valenciana, a former Ventura County, CA Sheriff’s deputy fights to get her job back after being terminated for being a victim of domestic violence. Terminating domestic violence victim Claudia Valenciana from her position as Deputy Sheriff in Ventura County, CA is unacceptable! Ventura County Sheriff needs to reinstate sheriff’s deputy Claudia Valenciana, a victim of domestic violence today. A victim of domestic violence should not be terminated for “being a victim of abuse”.
http://alexisamoore.blogspot.com/2009/08/ventura-county-sheriff-reinstate.html
For more information regarding the upcoming reinstatement hearing and to speak with Ms. Claudia Valenciana directly contact Alexis A. Moore.
Alexis A. Moore, President
Survivors In Action
P.O. Box 4584
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Telephone: (916) 941-7292
Fax: (916) 941-7216
Alexis@survivorsianction.com
http://www.AlexisAMoore.blogspot.com
http://www.SurvivorsInAction.com
"No victim left behind"
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Claudia Valenciana victim of abuse terminated as deputy sheriff wants job back
Posted by
DADVVA
at
10:04 AM
5
comments
Labels: alexis moore, claudia valenciana, ventura county
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Open Discussion: Rihanna and Chris Brown Date Violence Case.
We have all seen it on TV, in the newspaper; heard it on radio and even heard it being talked about amongst our friends yet we see people make uninformed judgment about DV.
The good thing about the media coverage of this case is that it brings domestic and date violence to the forefront. The much needed awareness we have all been asking for and looking for is here! It's also a moment to educate people about DV.
I found myself educating few people I met in another country on a trip about DV, all brought to light by the Rihanna and Chris Brown case. It's amazing how unaware people are and how quick they are to pass judgment and dish out names to Rihanna. I still stand by my words that NO one deserves to be abused regardless of what the circumstance might be.
Perhaps, a question I heard the most was "Why would a lady stay in an abusive relationship?"
I explained that there are reasons besides the obvious and contrary to what people might expect, in most cases, it's not as easy as packing up your bag and leaving. Several reasons for people staying in such relationships ranges from low self esteem, not wanting to be alone, wanting to change the abuser to threats made to the victim should he/she attempt to leave the relationship.
I would like to open this post up for discussion. Tell me your thoughts on the whole case, how you've educated someone on the issue, how the newest media coverage as affected your perspective on things, comments you've heard people pass amongst other things of interest you wish to share.
Domestic violence knows no boundaries so lets fight to bring an end to this. Join me in this cause!
Posted by
DADVVA
at
10:33 PM
15
comments
Labels: awareness, chris brown, domestic violence, rihanna
Domestic violence victim statement needed for press release regarding El Dorado Hills slaying of DV victim Cecilia Rivera
All we need is your first name, last initial and a "one liner" regarding how you feel about the life of another victim of abuse being taken. It can be anything. Please email me your comment asap. Lexi.Moore@yahoo.com
Example, “It is sad that another woman must lose her life to domestic violence when will domestic violence become a priority to law enforcement and considered a real crime? Alexis M. EDH, CA
Example, “I am a victim of abuse and stalking and my heart goes out to the family” Alexis M.
Here is the information regarding the incident. Women’s Legal Resource Foundation will be handling all the media inquiries. We need victims statements for impact it does make a difference!
Cecilia Rivera
- The shooter in the murder-suicide, Sean Paul Rioux, has now died from his self-inflicted gunshot wounds. (1)
- The coverage of the murder-suicide is disturbingly inconsistent, e.g., “The shootings are believed to be an isolated incident between the couple, who had a history of domestic violence, Golmitz said” (1)
- Police had been called to her apartment in the past for “domestic disturbances” (2)
- Before admitting there had been a history of domestic violence in the confusing manner above, Sgt. Golmitz had commented to the inquiry of an advocate: “No, the department is not aware of any history of violence reported by the victim.” (3)
- An Advocate from Women’s Legal Resource, questioned whether Sgt. Golmitz was aware that Cecilia had filed for an order of protection against Rioux on February 26, 2009. He responded: “I have no personal knowledge of the restraining order and I will turn this lead over to the officer in charge of the investigation.” (3)
- Describing the apartment complex where the shooting occurred as upscale, a resident is reported as saying: "To me, this town represents a nicer area ... you don't really hear of things like that really," (2)
Sources:
(1) http://www.sacbee.com/static/
Posted by
DADVVA
at
9:43 PM
1 comments
Labels: alexis moore, cecilia rivera, women's legal resource foundation
National Advocates Urge Congress to Reauthorize Fully Fund Critical Domestic Violence Funding Source
For Immediate Release: March 5, 2009
Contact: Brian Namey, 202-543-5566 ext. 124
Fully Fund Critical Domestic Violence Funding Source
Washington, D.C. – The National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) and the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV) yesterday hosted a congressional briefing to push for the reauthorization of the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (FVPSA). Survivors and advocates also met with more than a dozen U.S. House and Senate members and staff to underscore the importance of the legislation, a major federal funding source for the nation’s domestic violence shelters. The day’s events were made possible by the generosity of Mary Kay Inc. and The Allstate Corporation.
Sue Else, NNEDV president said, “We are urging lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to reauthorize FVPSA because thousands of domestic violence organizations and shelters across the country simply cannot operate without it. This legislation is truly the lifeblood for serving victims of domestic abuse.”
Two recent studies demonstrate that the services funded by FVPSA are working, but they remain under-funded. A study conducted by the University of Connecticut and the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence found that 99 percent of domestic violence survivors surveyed reported that they received the help they wanted from shelters. The second report – NNEDV’s annual Census of Domestic Violence – captured a 24-hour snapshot of domestic violence services rendered. In one day alone, programs served nearly 61,000 victims and answered more than 21,000 crisis hotline calls.
FVPSA provides critical funding for such services as safe shelters, crisis hotlines, and counseling for victims after they make the difficult decision to leave their abuser. Many programs are struggling to make ends meet and need FVPSA to be reauthorized and fully funded in order to continue.
“We need to do everything in our power to end domestic violence,” said Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), author of the Domestic Violence Misdemeanor Gun Ban. “My federal ban on gun possession by convicted domestic abusers has kept more than 150,000 guns out of the hands of domestic abusers. It is time to reauthorize the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act to support emergency shelters, crisis lines and local domestic violence programs across the country. We will continue fighting to keep all children and families safe from domestic abuse.”
Rita Smith, executive director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said, “Since 1984, FVPSA has been a critical funding source for most local domestic violence programs, which provide primary crisis services to families in need. As the economy worsens, local programs continue to see a reduction in funding from every revenue stream and some are forced reduce services and close their doors. We need Congress to reauthorize and fully fund FVPSA to prevent further reductions in programs and closures.”
Speakers at the congressional briefing included: Jane Tucker, a domestic violence survivor who co-founded a domestic violence shelter in York, Penn.; Barbara Spiegel, Executive Director of the Susan B. Anthony Project; Angela Rice, a college student and domestic violence survivor; and Rosie Hidalgo, Director of Public Policy at Casa de Esperanza.
Capping off the day’s advocacy was a reception honoring Rep. Donna Edwards (D-Md.), NNEDV’s co-founder and its first executive director. Roughly a dozen Senators and members of Congress attended and spoke. “Throughout all of her work, Congresswoman Edwards has always stood for hope and change. She has demonstrated a fierce commitment to social justice,” Else said. “NNEDV would not be in the formidable position it enjoys today without Congresswoman Edwards’ early leadership.”
Yes, Another Victory!! Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Hayes
Landmark Supreme Court Decision
Washington, D.C. – Advocates against domestic violence today applauded the U.S. Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision to uphold the federal Lautenberg Amendment that bans convicted domestic violence abusers from possessing firearms. The United States v. Hayes ruling reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that would have posed a serious danger to victims of domestic violence by allowing convicted abusers to maintain firearms.
“We are delighted with the Court’s decision to uphold reasonable limits on the possession of firearms,” said Sue Else, President of the National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV). “Batterers should not have access to guns. This decision is a major victory for victims of domestic violence and their families.”
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), a leader in the fight to reduce gun violence and the author of the domestic violence gun ban, said, “Since it was enacted, my domestic violence gun ban has kept more than 150,000 guns out of the hands of domestic abusers. We know a gun in the home makes it much more likely that domestic abuse results in death and today’s decision means we can continue keeping guns out of dangerous hands and saving innocent lives.”
The case originated in West Virginia, and the West Virginia Coalition Against Domestic Violence (WVCADV) is also celebrating today’s victory. “The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling aligns the Fourth Circuit with the rest of the country; confirms the intention of Congress in responding to the seriousness of domestic violence; and affirms levying real and long term consequences on people who use violence. WVCADV is pleased with the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices," said Sue Julian and Tonia Thomas, Team Coordinators for WVCADV.
NNEDV, joined by the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project (DV LEAP) at George Washington University Law School, filed a brief supporting the sensible ban on gun possession by all offenders convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence. The Court cited the brief in its decision.
Joan Meier, DV LEAP’s Director, said, “It is gratifying to see a strong majority of the Court reject the cramped and frankly illogical reading of the statute put forward by the Fourth Circuit and instead endorse the clear purpose of the legislature, not to mention common sense.”
“Arming the people who brutally beat their spouses or partners is a recipe for disaster,” Else said. “The Supreme Court made the right decision by upholding the domestic violence gun ban, keeping guns out of the hands of batterers and helping victims recovering from abuse to stay safe.”
Posted by
DADVVA
at
9:28 PM
0
comments
Labels: brian namey, national network to end domestic violence, NNEDV



5 comments:
Post a Comment